Digital Reading Behavior in Afghanistan: A Meta-Synthesis of Influential Factors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70436/nujah.v1i02.18Keywords:
Afghanistan, content localization, digital literacy, digital reading behavior, infrastructure limitations, meta-synthesis, multimedia integration.Abstract
The proliferation of digital technologies has transformed global reading practices, yet Afghanistan faces profound challenges with one of the world's lowest adult literacy rates (43%) and severely limited internet access (only around 18% of the population has consistent connectivity). This digital divide creates a significant barrier to the adoption of digital reading, necessitating a specialized investigation into the factors shaping digital reading behaviors in this unique context. A meta-synthesis following Sandelowski and Barroso's seven-step model was conducted, analyzing 25 qualitative and mixed-methods studies (2015-2025) from Afghanistan and comparable contexts. Databases searched included PubMed, ERIC, Google Scholar, and the repositories of Afghan universities. Studies were systematically evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP.) checklist and data analysis followed Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach. Key factors emerged across five domains: (1) Personal (digital literacy, motivation, cognitive load), (2) Environmental (infrastructure limitations), (3) Technical (device accessibility, UI design), (4) Psychosocial (family influence), and (5) Content-related (language localization, multimedia integration). Digital literacy and infrastructure were identified as the most critical barriers. Strengthening digital literacy programs, optimizing low-bandwidth content, and culturally adapting interfaces are vital for enhancing digital reading engagement in Afghanistan. Future research should focus on developing and testing pragmatic solutions tailored to this reality, including low-bandwidth content delivery models and community-based digital literacy initiatives.
References
Afghanistan Tech Forum. (2023). Bridging the first and second divides: A policy brief on digital access and literacy in Afghanistan. ATF Press.
Ahmad, S., & Hassan, R. (2022). Cultural localization in educational technology: A framework for engagement in Muslim-majority contexts. Journal of International Education, 45(3), 321–338.
American University of Afghanistan. (2025). AUAF online library database. https://library.auaf.edu.af
Ansary, M. (2023). Audio-supported digital reading for rural communities in Afghanistan: A study on comprehension and retention. Journal of Educational Technology in Developing Regions, 7(2), 112–128.
CASP. (2018). CASP qualitative checklist. https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/
Clinton, V. (2022). The cognitive consequences of reading on-screen: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, 100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100449
Coiro, J. (2021). The online reading comprehension assessment suite: A new approach to measuring deep learning with the internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(4), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.345
International Telecommunication Union. (2023). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2023. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
Karimi, L. (2021). Navigating the digital maze: A study of Dari/Pashto interface usability among high school students in Mazar-i-Sharif. Afghanistan Journal of Education, 7(1), 45–62.
Khan, A. (2023). User interface preferences for digital reading platforms in rural Afghanistan: A usability study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 39(8), 1523–1535.
Mohammadi, R. (2022). Family dynamics and digital device usage in Afghan households: Implications for educational technology adoption. Journal of Cross-Cultural Family Studies, 14(3), 245–261.
Moyer, J. E. (2020). The end of books: Or, books without end? Reading interactive narratives. University of Michigan Press.
Nildarar, S., & Koohi Rostami, M. (2025). Identifying factors influencing digital reading behavior: A meta-synthesis study. Library and Information Sciences, 28(2), 89–117.
Rahimi, F. (2022). The interrupted scholar: A survey on the impact of infrastructure failures on university students in Kabul. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 890–905.
Safi, M. (2021). Lost in translation: The need for culturally relevant digital content in Afghan classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103357
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. Springer Publishing Company.
Stanikzai, H. (2020). Mobile-first reading: Smartphone dependency and digital reading practices in Afghanistan. Mobile Media & Communication, 8(3), 456–473.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In P. Chandler & A. Sweller (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
UNESCO. (2022). Education in Afghanistan: A wake-up call. https://www.unesco.org/en/education-afghanistan-wake-up-call
Wardak, A. (2023). Vocational motivations for digital reading: Skill acquisition and employability in Afghan training programs. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 75(2), 234–251.
World Bank. (2023). Afghanistan digital development overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/afghanistan/brief/digital-development
World Literacy Foundation. (2023). Offline solutions for online learning: A global report on community digital libraries in low-bandwidth regions. WLF Publications.
Yar, F. G. M., & Naderi, M. E. (2025). Smart rural development: Using information technology for sustainable rural planning. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 5(2), 2265–2274. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i2.50799
